A TIGER/Line Defect Audit of Hamilton County's MetroNow Microtransit Service Area: Methods, Results, and Volunteer Remediation Pathways

AuthorKrass AffiliationIndependent LocusCincinnati-area MetroNow rider VersionApril 2026 Sourcegithub.com/AICincy/Tiger

Abstract. SORTA's MetroNow microtransit service in Hamilton County, Ohio, is operated by Via Transportation against an OpenStreetMap (OSM) base layer in which a non-trivial residual of unreviewed ways persists from the 2007–2008 TIGER/Line bulk import. We present a four-zone read-only audit that enumerates every way carrying tiger:reviewed=no inside each MetroNow service-zone bounding box, classifies each into a four-element disjoint taxonomy (A false-one-way, B multi-segment, AB compound, C residual), and applies an endpoint-distance heuristic with junction-level spatial clustering to identify probable node disconnects between same-named segments. After cross-zone deduplication by OSM way ID and connected-components analysis on shared way IDs, the system-wide population is 6,096 unique unreviewed ways, of which 221 carry the compound defect and 710 are probable node disconnects. We characterise the heuristic's recall bias at zone boundaries, position the five methodological constraints that frame the result-set as a lower bound on the true defect population, and locate the audit within the comparability standard of 49 C.F.R. § 37.121 without pre-empting the legal question.

1. Introduction

The pipeline that delivers a microtransit ride to a residential address depends on a chain of base-map abstractions whose error budgets are rarely audited end-to-end. Where that chain consumes OpenStreetMap (OSM)1, the inherited error budget includes any uncorrected artefact of the 2007–2008 TIGER/Line bulk import that has persisted in unreviewed form for the intervening two decades. The operational consequence is asymmetric: a single false oneway=yes tag on a residential segment, or a missing intersection node between two segments of the same physical street, is sufficient to render a target address unreachable to a routing engine that treats the OSM graph as authoritative. For a transit-dependent rider, the distinction between “unreachable” and “denied service” is not a technicality.

This audit was prompted by a routing failure of that class observed within the author's own MetroNow service area. The case index proved non-idiosyncratic. We extend the analysis to all four MetroNow service zones and report a deduplicated population-level inventory of the same defect class, an explicit characterisation of the heuristics that produced it, and a discussion of where those heuristics undercount.